character.ai vs google.com
Core Web Vitals side-by-side, Chrome user field data
google.com wins 5 of 5 vitals.
| Metric | character.ai | google.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCPLargest Contentful Paint | 7719ms | 2887ms | google.com |
| INPInteraction to Next Paint | 426ms | 205ms | google.com |
| CLSCumulative Layout Shift | 0.80 | 0.00 | google.com |
| FCPFirst Contentful Paint | 3124ms | 2687ms | google.com |
| TTFBTime to First Byte | 1954ms | 1198ms | google.com |
character.ai
LCPpoor
7719ms
Largest Contentful Paint
INPneeds improvement
426ms
Interaction to Next Paint
CLSpoor
0.8
Cumulative Layout Shift
google.com
LCPneeds improvement
2887ms
Largest Contentful Paint
INPneeds improvement
205ms
Interaction to Next Paint
CLSgood
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
How to read this
Scores come from real Chrome users visiting these sites in the last 28 days, aggregated by Google's CrUX. Lower is better for all metrics. Green = "good," amber = "needs improvement," red = "poor." Learn more about Core Web Vitals or read our CrUX vs Lighthouse guide.